Is philosophical thought the beginning of academic science?
Dear Academics, Today we are talking about the relation of science and philosophical thought. I suggest something attractive in the way of logical thinking rather than applying different theories as de facto. Is philosophical thought the beginning of academic science? We can answer this question in this way: Firstly, the first humans started to obtain and learn about the environment, what scientists actually do nowadays. If I touch something, what is the reaction of that? But philosophical thought is something different. After getting the experience, I collect my knowledge, and understand the meaning of this action and my senses to that, inviting people to do the same action, I have a thought of how it is perceived by society. The philosophical thought is: Learning and observing something new, you take new opportunities into your life. Without coming out of the box, you don’t produce new thoughts and actions. You teach that you have known what you are experienced in. Do you stop teaching without new knowledge? You need new pupils to teach who don't know the subject which you are experienced in. So, the hypothesis is: Life is endless because of the need for «new», but at the same time the new has the characteristics of the individual's perception, for some it is new, and for others it is not, but the one who does not know is new for the one who knows, thus new knowledge is produced only in the case of participatory with the new. I think and it means I have a philosophical thought that can be identified as an importance also if a thinker thinks about himself in the context of «I» as a human in relation to the Universe. How to identify that it is important? Looking at the previous hypothesis of «new», it could have that relation, but it is not enough, so for identifying it as a scientific and philosophical thought, our assumption should reply to the next questions: Objective Relevance Tasks Theoretical and practical significance Having an objective, you have a reason, not every time reason is related to a problem. Reason as an improvement. Welcome to create your philosophical thoughts because you will improve the individual and social lives of millions of people and solve global problems. Welcome to ask about writing for you the essay, motivational letter, research proposal, to subscribe about open calls, conferences, grants and open academic positions writing by email: ask@thefoundationforacademics.com Instagram: @thefoundationforacademics #thefoundationforacademics #academics #thefoundation #education #highereducation #alexandraachudinova #thenobelprize #science #academy #phd #postdoc #academicacareer #research #research #фондакадемиков #education #fund #highereducation #honour #academicculture #university
Dear Academics, Today we are talking about the relation of science and philosophical thought. I suggest something attractive in the way of logical thinking rather than applying different theories as de facto. Is philosophical thought the beginning of academic science? We can answer this question in this way: Firstly, the first humans started to obtain and learn about the environment, what scientists actually do nowadays. If I touch something, what is the reaction of that? But philosophical thought is something different. After getting the experience, I collect my knowledge, and understand the meaning of this action and my senses to that, inviting people to do the same action, I have a thought of how it is perceived by society. The philosophical thought is: Learning and observing something new, you take new opportunities into your life. Without coming out of the box, you don’t produce new thoughts and actions. You teach that you have known what you are experienced in. Do you stop teaching without new knowledge? You need new pupils to teach who don't know the subject which you are experienced in. So, the hypothesis is: Life is endless because of the need for «new», but at the same time the new has the characteristics of the individual's perception, for some it is new, and for others it is not, but the one who does not know is new for the one who knows, thus new knowledge is produced only in the case of participatory with the new. I think and it means I have a philosophical thought that can be identified as an importance also if a thinker thinks about himself in the context of «I» as a human in relation to the Universe. How to identify that it is important? Looking at the previous hypothesis of «new», it could have that relation, but it is not enough, so for identifying it as a scientific and philosophical thought, our assumption should reply to the next questions: Objective Relevance Tasks Theoretical and practical significance Having an objective, you have a reason, not every time reason is related to a problem. Reason as an improvement. Welcome to create your philosophical thoughts because you will improve the individual and social lives of millions of people and solve global problems. Welcome to ask about writing for you the essay, motivational letter, research proposal, to subscribe about open calls, conferences, grants and open academic positions writing by email: ask@thefoundationforacademics.com Instagram: @thefoundationforacademics #thefoundationforacademics #academics #thefoundation #education #highereducation #alexandraachudinova #thenobelprize #science #academy #phd #postdoc #academicacareer #research #research #фондакадемиков #education #fund #highereducation #honour #academicculture #university